Header image  

 

 

Immigration Lawyers

 

 
   
         

 

 

 


 
 

 

Federal Contractors with Immigration Violations Subject to Debarment

(October 2008)

 

ICE Debarment of Seven Companies. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced on September 12, 2008, that seven companies will be considered for debarment from federal contracting because each was found to be unlawfully employing persons without employment authorization.  The debarment action was taken against companies providing a variety of service and/or products to the U.S. Government, including construction, landscaping, fruit, cleaning services as well as technology services.

(Read more - ICE Debarment Action)

Basis for Debarment.  Federal Contractors may be considered for debarment under the authority of Executive Orders 12989 and 13286, pursuant to FAR § 9.406-2(b)(2), for several different violations of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) including:

  • Convictions of knowingly hiring unauthorized workers;
  • Convictions of continuing to employ an alien who is or becomes unauthorized;
  • Convictions of engaging in patterns and practices of knowingly hiring or continuing to knowingly employ unauthorized workers; or,
  • Issuance of a final order for a civil fine which reflects unlawful hiring or continuing to hire unauthorized workers.

(Read more - Debarment Q&A)

Debarment as Part of Government Increase in Enforcement Against Employers.  With the launch of the second phase of the Secure Border Initiative, ICE has initiated a strategic shift in the way it approaches employers that intentionally violate the law and knowingly hire illegal aliens by bringing criminal charges against them and seizing their illegally-derived assets -- rather than relying on the old tactic of administrative fines as sanctions. Last fiscal year, this new approach resulted in 127 criminal convictions, up from 46 the previous fiscal year. More employers are also being charged with money laundering violations, which can result in prison sentences of up to 20 years. Last year, a single ICE worksite enforcement investigation resulted in a settlement and forfeiture of $15 million, an amount that represented the largest worksite enforcement penalty in U.S. history and surpassed the sum of all administrative fines from the previous eight years. ICE seeks to enhance its worksite enforcement investigations with proposed additional funding. The Administration's fiscal year 2007 budget request seeks $41.7 million in new funds and 171 additional agents to enhance ICE's worksite enforcement efforts. Most recently, ICE brought criminal charges against seven current and former managers of the nation’s largest pallet services company and arrested more than 1,000 of the company’s illegal alien employees.

(Read More - ICE Enforcement On the Rise)

The Executive Order (Amending Executive Order 12989) dated June 9th, 2008, instructs federal agencies to require contractor participation in E-Verify, and the proposed rule provides detailed guidance on how that requirement is to be implemented.  However, the proposed rule is not a final rule; it is a proposal that is open for public comment at this time.

(Read More - E-Verify Proposed for Federal Contractors)

 

Glinsmann & Glinsmann, Chartered can assist you and your company with compliance of the immigration laws.  Here are some of the services we can provide you:

  • Form I-9 Compliance
  • Assist in Verifying the Authenticity of Documents
  • Conduct Employer Requested Audit
  • Represent Company in an ICE Audit or Raid
  • Represent Company if Fined for Immigration Law Violations

 

 

 

Seven companies notified of potential debarment for unlawful employment practices

WASHINGTON - U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) notified seven companies that they will be considered for debarment from federal contracting because each has been found to be unlawfully employing persons without employment authorization.

"By using debarment in appropriate circumstances, the federal government can avoid working with businesses that employ an illegal workforce and unscrupulously undercut their competitors to gain an unfair market advantage because of reduced labor costs. This is yet another tool that we believe will further ensure compliance with our nation's immigration employment laws," said Julie L. Myers, Homeland Security Assistant Secretary for ICE.

The Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) provide that contractors may be considered for debarment if they have been found to have either knowingly hire an unauthorized worker or to continue to employ an alien who is or becomes unauthorized.

The following seven companies are being considered for debarment:

  • Bynum Brothers Home Improvement Co. - Buffalo, N.Y.
  • CMC Concrete Construction, Inc. - Manassas, Va.
  • Hedges Landscape Specialists Inc. d/b/a Exterior Designs, Inc. and d/b/a Performance Irrigation, LLC - Crestwood, Ky.
  • Lochirco Fruit & Produce Inc. d/b/a Happy Apples - Union, Mo.
  • MC Cleaning - Bangor, Maine
  • Morgan Jones LLC d/b/a Jones Industrial Network and d/b/a Jones Networking - Baltimore, Md.
  • Stonewall Concrete, Inc. - Manassas, Va.

The effect of these proposed debarments is as follows:

  • Each company's name has been entered into the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), which is a web-based system that identifies parties suspended, debarred, proposed for debarment or otherwise excluded from receiving federal contracts, certain subcontracts, and certain types of federal financial and non-financial assistance and benefits.
  • The companies are immediately prohibited from competing for new government contracts.
  • The proposed debarment and immediate suspension apply government-wide. Neither ICE, nor any other federal agency, may award a new contract while these companies are on the EPLS.
  • Each company may, within 30 days, challenge the decision.

The General Services Administration is the agency responsible for maintaining the EPLS. To view the EPLS and to find out more information about the system, please visit www.epls.gov. Businesses can also find out more about the ICE debarment process at www.ice.gov.

(NOTE: Some or all of the above text from www.ICE.gov website.)

 

 

 

Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Debarment Questions and Answers

1.) How is debarment defined?

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 2.1 provides a definition of debarment. “Debarment” means action taken by a debarring official under 9.406 to exclude a contractor from Government contracting and Government-approved subcontracting for a reasonable, specified period; a contractor that is excluded is “debarred.” Also refer to 2 CFR Part 180, Subpart 1 – Definitions: § 180.925 Debarment. Debarment means an action taken by a debarring official under Subpart H of this part to exclude a person from participating in covered transactions and transactions covered under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter I). A person so excluded is debarred.

2.) Who is considered to be a contractor?

The FAR Subpart 9.403 defines a “contractor” broadly to include any individual or other legal entity that conducts any business, or is expected to conduct any business, with the Government as an agent or representative of another contractor.

3.) What is the period of exclusion for a debarment taken under the Immigration and Nationality Act?

The ICE Suspension and Debarment Official (SDO) would determine the length of the debarment commensurate with the seriousness of the cause(s) and the period of debarment would depend on whether the violation was civil or criminal.  For civil violations, the Cause and Treatment Code (CT Code) 08-INA-01 in the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) states “Debarments are for one year, and may be extended for additional one year increments if continuing violations are found by the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General”. For criminal violations, the CT Code 08-INA-02 states “Debarments are for a specified term as determined by the debarring agency and as indicated in the listing.”  See FAR 9.406-4.

4.) What are the causes for a debarment taken under the Immigration and Nationality Act?

Under the authority of Executive Orders 12989 and 13286, contractors may be considered for debarment, pursuant to FAR § 9.406-2(b)(2), for several different violations of the INA including:

  • Convictions of knowingly hiring unauthorized workers;
  • Convictions of continuing to employ an alien who is or becomes unauthorized;
  • Convictions of engaging in patterns and practices of knowingly hiring or continuing to knowingly employ unauthorized workers; or,
  • Issuance of a final order for a civil fine which reflects unlawful hiring or continuing to hire unauthorized workers.

5.) How will a contractor know they are going to be debarred?

The FAR Subpart 9.406-3 (c) Notice of Proposal to Debar, details the debarment process. Contractors being considered for debarment will be notified of the basis for proposed debarment and have 30 days to respond, in writing, in person, or through a representative, as to why they should not be debarred.

6.) What companies are you looking at now?

Please refer to our press releases as we issue notifications to contractors and update the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) with their names. 

7.) I didn’t know about this policy before.  Why is my company being debarred now?

The former INS was authorized to debar companies who hire unauthorized workers in 1996.  The INS worksite strategy, however, focused primarily on the use of civil fines to gain employer compliance.  In contrast, ICE implemented a worksite enforcement strategy that focused on bringing criminal charges and seeking criminal fines and forfeitures against employers. This investigative strategy has resulted in convictions and violations that make companies amenable for debarment. The initial companies notified of possible debarment have been found to have knowingly hired or continued to employ unauthorized workers within the past 2 years.

8.) How does the debarment affect major corporations and their components?  Say a major corporation is debarred, does that mean all its subsidiaries are debarred as well?

Normally, the scope of the debarment will be limited to those organizational units that have engaged in the unlawful hiring of unauthorized workers.

See FAR Subpart 9.406-1 (a) and (b)(1) and (2) for a complete discussion. The debarring official must determine whether debarment is in the Government’s interest. The debarring official may debar a contractor for any of the causes in FAR Subpart 9.406-2, using procedures in 9.406-3. The existence of a cause for debarment does not necessarily require that the contractor be debarred. The seriousness of the contractor’s acts or omissions and any remedial measures or mitigating factors should be considered before any debarment action is taken. Debarment constitutes debarment of all divisions or other organizational elements of the contractor unless the decision is limited by its terms to specific divisions, organizational elements, or commodities.  

9.) How many contractors are currently debarred?

ICE currently has not debarred any contractors.  Once ICE debars a contractor, its name and information will be entered into the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) by ICE.

10.)  What is the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)?

The Excluded Parties Listing Systems (EPLS) is an electronic, web-based system that identifies parties suspended, debarred, proposed for debarment or otherwise excluded from receiving Federal contracts, certain subcontracts, and certain types of Federal financial and non-financial assistance and benefits.  The General Services Administration is the agency responsible for maintaining the EPLS.  To view the EPLS and to find out more information about the system, please visit www.epls.gov.

12.) If a contractor is debarred and they have an existing contract, what happens to them?

FAR 9.405-1 Continuation of current contracts states,

  1. Notwithstanding the debarment or proposed debarment of a contractor, agencies may continue contracts or subcontracts in existence at the time the contractor was debarred or proposed for debarment unless the agency head directs otherwise. A decision as to the type of termination action, if any, to be taken should be made only after review by agency contracting and technical personnel and by counsel to ensure the propriety of the proposed action.
  2. For contractors debarred or proposed for debarment, unless the agency head makes a written determination of the compelling reasons for doing so, ordering activities shall not-
    1. Place orders exceeding the guaranteed minimum under indefinite quantity contracts;
    2. Place orders under optional use Federal Supply Schedule contracts, blanket purchase agreements, or basic ordering agreements; or,
    3. Add new work, exercise options, or otherwise extend the duration of current contracts or orders.

(NOTE: Some or all of the above text from www.ICE.gov website.)

 

Links to RELATED Government Resources

ICE Fact Page on Debarment of Government Contractors

Federal Contractors – Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Introduction to E-Verify

Press Release – Designating E-Verify for Federal Contractors

 
 

 
 
 

Schedule a Consultation

 
 

12 Russell Avenue

Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877

301-987-0030

Fax: 301-987-0025

 
This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.